Three Questions about the 4-3-3

By on August 25, 2009

You've been Arsenalised!!!

For me, there are three main questions which are yet to be answered following the first three matches. Admittedly, none can be answered in a weekend or two and I believe each holds part of the key to how successful Arsenal can be with this formation this season. First, what have we learned about the 4-3-3 in the pre-season and, now, the first week. Well, we have learned that it produces goals, mostly from midfield. We have learned that the 3-man midfield is providing more cover for the defense than last season, when it was Song’s responsibility alone. I would think that we have also learned that we may have found a formation that aids us in better breaking down bottom half defenses than the 4-4-2 or 4-5-1 had. But beyond these positives, questions remain:

Can the forwards score goals in this formation?

Robin van Persie I believe they can. Getting 11 goals from the midfield in the first three matches is hardly anything to be worried about. Instead, we should rejoice. Many of us have pined for the days of getting close to thirty goals from our two wide positions combined. Players like van Persie, Arshavin, Eduardo, and Bendtner, are going to score goals. That’s inevitable. Will van Persie score as many as he did last year? Maybe not, but he probably won’t need to. And an adjustment period was also going to be inevitable, as well. Van Persie and Bendtner, especially, are playing entirely new roles in an entirely new formation. He spoke after the Celtic match about still trying to find his feet in the formation and I have no doubt that he will quickly become more comfortable in his new role.

Another question related to the forwards’ acclimation to the 4-3-3 is… will Nicklas Bendtner be able to cope with his defensive duties when playing wide right? At Everton and Celtic, he did a good job of tracking back when necessary, but does he have the determination to go running up and down the wing for 90 minutes? But running is only half the game, he will also need to defend. Bendtner has been prone to making forward’s tackles and he will need to relearn how to defend. In the first two matches he was defensively adequate but he was not tested by a quality opponent. How would he deal with, say, the Ashley Young who showed up at Liverpool yesterday or Nani on one of his rare good days? This leads us to our next question…

How will it work against the big sides?

Pretty self-explanatory. We’ve seen Arsenal destroy Everton away and dismantle Pompey at home. We’ve also seen a gutsy win at Celtic Park. But how will this formation work against clubs that are far better equipped to exploit its weaknesses? Like I said above, I believe the formation is providing a bit of extra cover in midfield just above the defense but it leaves us a bit more exposed than usual in wide areas. We’ll find out a part of the answer on Saturday when Arsenal travel to Old Trafford. Of course, when you look at the other Big 3, none are especially dangerous coming down the wings. United’s scoring threats are all coming through the middle now and Chelsea have seemingly done the impossible and become even more narrow under Ancelotti. Liverpool have Glen Johnson but he wasn’t nearly as impressive against a decent Villa side as he was against Stoke City.

But even that ignores the fact that the league is not win in matches against the other Big 4 clubs, but against the rest of the league. United didn’t do very well against their direct competitors last season but they pretty much beat every team they should have. Liverpool, by contrast, lost only twice but found themselves on the end of far too many draws against sides they should’ve beat. If, as I proposed above, the 4-3-3 will enable us to better break down lower-level clubs who park the bus, that could prove the difference this season.

How will it work without Cesc and/or Song?

Aaron Ramsey

This is something we cannot help but wonder. Both Cesc and Song have been integral to the club’s successful start. Cesc has always been the focal point of the team no matter the formation, but Song has shown that he is an integral part of this 3-man midfield. The side coped well with Diaby coming in for Song against Portsmouth and Denilson falling back but it was only Portsmouth. Unfortunately, we will get our first clue to our coping abilities without Cesc when Celtic come to the Emirates. Cesc suffered a hamstring problem during the Portsmouth match and could even miss out on the trip to United. Can Diaby and/or Denilson provide enough cover for the defense when Song is out, or off to the ACN, and can Ramsey, Wilshere, or Nasri when he returns, step up and deliver the creativity lost when Cesc is out?

These are the questions which, for me, will hold the keys to Arsenal’s possibilities for success these season. We can speculate as much as we want but only many more games will give us the answers. [digg=http://digg.com/soccer/Three_Questions_about_the_4_3_3]



  1. chakravo

    August 25, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    Good right up, mate. I think you are absolutely right about the fact that how we cope without Song will be a key issue this season. Diaby showed glimpses in the game against Portsmouth that he can do the job IF he really puts his head down and concentrates. I think that when we have Nasri – and maybe even Rosicky – back, Cesc, Denilson, Ramsey, Nasri, can all play similar roles. Also when Vela returns, Arshavin can play the Cesc role with a front three of Vela, RvP and NB52.

    • ArsenalStation

      August 25, 2009 at 12:43 pm

      Exactly, chak… and that is what I’ve been praising about the 4-3-3, the fact that it gives us so many more options in attack and should allow for increased roles for players like Bendtner, Eduardo, and Vela.

  2. Casicky

    August 26, 2009 at 7:55 am

    I agree with you as usual which is not surprising anymore hahaha
    I have been thinkin that Cesc and Song will be missed in that foramtion but another thing i have been thinkin is who exactly can lead the attack like Van-P??
    Bendtner like to play behind a striker and attack the defence,bringing other players in to the game aint his strong point,and Eduardo is a finisher he aint the best at hold up playing to play in midfielders unless he is playin on the wings where he doesnt have the direct route at goal so that kinda leaves Van-P as the only one who can spearhead the attack.
    Thats why for Celtic i would like to see some different options tried out and hopefully discovered quite eager for us to start with a foramtion like this
    i know its a bit of a stretch to start a game with Ces and then take out Van-P so um thinkin he mite start but at some stage would like to see how Eduardo or Bendt52 do as the spearhead of the attack….maybe thats why Chamahk is so much an option coz i feel he could fit the bill.

    what do you think??

    3-1 against the Bhoys,Eduardo,Arshavin and Diaby


  3. nesa

    March 1, 2010 at 10:29 am

    o matë mirtjenimos jav nin The Best Arsenal

  4. Oyebode adebisi

    March 2, 2010 at 2:53 am

    I am so sorry 4 ramsey becos he is just a player who have a long way to go in other to become a star. Pray dat god will give him quick recovery

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>