The Differences between the Invincibles and the Current Arsenal Side

By on July 29, 2009


While many Arsenal supporters are already mourning the loss of Kolo Toure ahead of his expected move to Manchester City in the coming hours, Arsenal Station would like to take this occasion to look at the major differences between the current side and the Invincibles, of which Toure was the last surviving member at the club.

Far more significant than the personnel changes in the club since Arsenal lifted the Premier League trophy with a record of 26-12-0 on 15 May 2004 have been the changes in style. I would like to take a look at what I see as the six major differences in style between these two Arsene Wenger sides.

The most glaring difference between the current side and the Invincibles is in central midfield. In fact, it is the biggest difference between this and ALL of Wenger’s Arsenal sides. Wenger used to rely on a strong central midfield and strong central midfielders to win and hold possession. Even when Arsene brought in a Brazilian in Gilberto, he was the hardest Brazilian midfielder at the time. However, Wenger’s choosing of Fabregas to replace Vieira in the midfield upon the latter’s departure signaled a momentous shift in the footballing philosophy at Arsenal. It meant that Arsenal would move from a strong, powerful central midfield to a smaller, more creative type of midfield.

robert piresBecause of the strength in the center of midfield, the Invincibles had most of their attacking creativity deposited wide on the wings in Pires and Ljungberg. Yet both players were equally adept at regularly getting into more central scoring positions. This allowed Arsene to counterbalance the choice for strength over creativity in the center. Since players like Ljungberg and Pires are not widely available, if at all, Arsene has sought to create that type of player by putting players whose natural position is the center out on the wings and giving them free license. But while Hleb and Rosicky never really fulfilled the hopes of 12-15 goals from the wing, it seems that he may now have found the answer in Arshavin, Nasri, and Walcott.

Another by-product of the change in midfield style has been the loss of the counterattack as a primary weapon. In all my years watching football, I have never seen a team break more quickly, more efficiently, and more creatively than the Arsenal of 2002-05. Yet as Arsenal’s style became more dependent on possession, counterattacking opportunities have become fewer and seemingly less appealing to a team in search of the “perfect goal.”

Dennis with Prem trophyAnother difference between the sides is the lack of a player in the role of Dennis Bergkamp. Arsenal only truly play someone in that role when they have used a 4-5-1 in recent years. Now one might say that Robin van Persie plays off the main striker and, positionally-speaking, that may be correct at times. But van Persie doesn’t link Fabregas in the midfield to the main striker with the same determination as Bergkamp. This is not necessarily van Persie’s fault since that was Bergkamp’s defined role and he relished in it. van Persie is far more useful in and around the box than 25-30 yards out looking for runs into the box, anyway. Yet it remains a serious stylistic change.

The most tangible difference between the sides are their homes. The Invincibles played their matches on the narrow Highbury pitch in a stadium that reeked of history and tradition. The current side ply their trade on a significantly larger pitch created to accomodate this change of style in a state-of-the-art facility with no aura surrounding it. That is where the biggest challenge to the new side comes in… the Invincibles inherited a home, this new side must create their own home… by bringing trophies back to it.

Finally, and quite possibly the most significant difference between the sides is in the defense. This has less to do with the makeup of the back four than its overall record. No Wenger team has conceded more goals than the current side. In fact, the late defensive run by the club last season saw them narrowly avoid conceding an average of a goal per match, something the club has done only once in Wenger’s reign (2002-03). The center back pairing of Gallas-Toure has never come close to that of Campbell-Toure and that is mostly down to the fact that Gallas is no Campbell but also Kolo is not nearly the player now that he was then. In 2003-04, Toure was only in his second season at the club and just beginning to get regular starts in his new position. He still had the hunger of a young, unproven upstart. Following his return from the 2008 African Cup of Nations, he never really looked the same player.

I am not implicitly saying that any of these changes are necessarily for the worst, though, inevitably, they may be perceived that way, and may actually be, until Arsene and his new style finally bring the first trophies to the Emirates. In honour of the “Invincibles,” enjoy “49: The Complete Unbeaten Record.”

[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.855830&w=450&h=350&fv=]

more about “49: The Complete Unbeaten Record“, posted with vodpod




  1. Brett

    July 29, 2009 at 11:54 am

    Well put. Hard to argue with any of the points made. I do agree that it appears we now have as much talent on the wings as we have had since the days of Pires and Freddie and their slashing runs. However, I also think, based on the personnel in the squad and the way theyve been deployed in preseason, we’ll see less of our traditional 4-4-2 and more of a form of 4-3-3. While we may as supporters be unfamiliar with it, this is a system played to great effect by Barcelona this past season, and if there is another team with the skill players necessary to pull it off, it’s the Gunners. However, and I think Arsene Knows this, it depends heavily on a ball-winning defensive central midfielder to protect the back 4 and to collect and distribute the ball to the attacking players. This was a skill which Gilberto was (and watching Brazil, still is) fabulously gifted at. I believe if we can find a player of a similar skill set, we should jump at the chance. And with the seemingly impending departure of Kolo on the heels of Adebarndoor, we certainly have the funds to make this happen… we’ll all be waiting with baited breath in the weeks to come, I’m sure.

  2. natsteel

    July 29, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    I agree, Brett, that we are seeing more of a 4-3-3 in the preseason and I have to say that I like it. It seems an attempt to get the wide players into even more advanced attacking positions and that can only be a good thing as I feel that we need a combined 30 goals from both wings this season. And at the same time it allows us to have a straight DM in Song and another CM with the option of falling back in front of the back four along with Song. It seems that it can be flexible enough to allow us greater attacking options and improved cover for the defense from midfield.

  3. Gooner Chris

    July 29, 2009 at 12:18 pm

    Great article Nat, it’s something that not many blogs have pointed out and I agree with your take on it.

    As for the other comment I left you, any sort of opinion piece would be great, it would be up to you what kind of article you’re going to post.

    Get back to me on my email @ goonerchris@goonertalk.com


    P.S – Tell Triplec to keep up the good work, his articles are brilliantly put together as well. :)

    • natsteel

      July 29, 2009 at 12:32 pm

      Thanks alot, Chris. I appreciate that. I’ll get back to you really soon about the piece. Great pic of Kolo today, by the way.

  4. Rick

    July 29, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Mike, this is so true:

    “Another by-product of the change in midfield style has been the loss of the counterattack as a primary weapon. In all my years watching football, I have never seen a team break more quickly, more efficiently, and more creatively than the Arsenal of 2002-05. Yet as Arsenal’s style became more dependent on possession, counterattacking opportunities have become fewer and seemingly less appealing to a team in search of the “perfect goal.” ”

    I remember speaking to a friend of mine who is a Milan supporter and we agreed that Arsenal was a counter attack beast those years …

    • natsteel

      July 29, 2009 at 3:08 pm

      They really were. I’ve never seen a team regularly counterattack to more devastating effect than the team that went unbeaten in 49 matches. It was just absolutely glorious to watch.

  5. disney rapunzel sweater

    October 28, 2014 at 4:56 pm

    Hello, i believe that i saw you visited my blog thus i got here to go back the desire?.I am trying to to find things to enhance my site!I suppose its good enough to use some of
    your concepts!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>